Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4910 14
Original file (NR4910 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT CF TRE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001

ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TUR
Docket No: 4910-14
7 November 2014

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF yy osc.

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) DD Form 149 with attachments

(2) Case Summary

(3) Petitioner's naval record

(4) HOMC MPLB JAD (JPL) ltr atd 30SEP14

“4. pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an
enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by
removing any and all derogatory material referencing a conviction
by summary court-martial (scm). This request includes, but is
not limited to any and all other references surrounding the
circumstances of this SCM as reflected in his Official Military
Personnel File ({OMPF}, Electronic Service Record (ESR), and the
Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS), where applicable.

2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Midboe, and
Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 28 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record, Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the
board considered the advisory opinion (AO) furnished by
Headquarters Marine Corps, a COpy of which is provided as
enclosures (4).

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and:
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure {1) was filed in a timely manner.
TTR
Docket No: 4910-14

c¢. Petitioner's record contains documentation regarding trial
hy SOM executed on 15 December 2008 However, om 26 Aobaher
2007, the findings and sentence were “set aside and dismissed”
due to materially prejudicial error. Nonetheless, the

documentation remained in the record.

d. An AO, enclosure (4), received from the Marine Corps
recommends relief regarding Petitioner's request to remove the
improperly filed documentation, specifically, the SCM, and
references thereto. In this regard, the advisory opinion states,
in part, that the SCM should be removed because the findings and
sentence had been set aside and dismissed.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. In this regard, the Board substantially concurs with the
comments contained in the AO and concludes that since the
documentation, as it appears in the record, is inaccurate as
written and filed, all references should be removed from the
record.

In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an
error and injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
and/or totally obliterating the SCM execution on 15 December
2005, and all references thereto.

b. That any and all materials or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed, or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or materials be added to the record in the future.

ce. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy. of
this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file

maintained for such purpose, with no cross-reference being made a
part of Petitioner's naval record.
TUR
Docket No: 4910-14

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the

£ TA--= 7 Dan en aera Pam me Ae ia =

oe met fea Lal mage de 4 - oe :
my yt PN ON ETE SE cr oy Loe A SA ot oh

Board TOE LOEYSeCULonm Ga bhava eee
Regulations, Section 723.6(c), it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the

foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

T. J. “REED
Recorder

f,

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

behalf of the Secretary of the Navy’.

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04936-11

    Original file (04936-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NUP) imposed on 7 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, reguiations, and policies. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by totally obliterating or removing the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07639-10

    Original file (07639-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NIP) imposed on 30 October 2009. The AOs recommendation states, in part, as follows: wan officer who imposes NJP may suspend, remit or mitigate any part or amount of the unexecuted portion of that punishment; may set aside in whole or in part...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09259-10

    Original file (09259-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former officer of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in part, that his record be corrected by removing the nonjudicial punishment (NIP) imposed on 3 September 2009. f. In an AO from MIO dated 21 October 2010, it was recommended that since Petitioner had committed the offenses of failure to obey a lawful order and drunken driving, his record, specifically, the administrative remarks (counselling)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00078-12

    Original file (00078-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NUP) imposed on 12 June 2009. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 January 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6447 14

    Original file (NR6447 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all references regarding imposition of a nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for willful disobedience. In this regard, these AOs recommend Petitioner's request be denied because he did receive NJP on 11 May 2007, and was properly issued an adverse FITREP as a result of the NUP. REED Recorder S....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5273 14

    Original file (NR5273 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing a nonjudicial punishment (NJP) dated 28 June 1999, and inaccurate derogatory material referencing assignment to weight control. f. Both advisory opinions, enclosure (2), received from Headquarters Marine Corps (JPL and MIQ) regarding Petitioner’s request to remove the NUP recommend his request be denied...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3306 14

    Original file (NR3306 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material referencing the imposition of nonjudicial punishment (NUP) on 4 April 2012 for failure to obey a lawful order and an administrative remarks (Page 11) entry regarding her norirecommendation for promotion due to the NIP, also dated 4 April 2012. The Board, consisting of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7161 13

    Original file (NR7161 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) imposed on 19 August 2011. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Whalen, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5856 13

    Original file (NR5856 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NUP) imposed on 28 May 2010. In this regard, the commanding officer’s action included, and was not limited to, removal of any and all other references to the NUP, and restoration of all rights and privileges affected by the punishment imposed. That any and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5734 14

    Original file (NR5734 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Enclosures {1) through (3) apply. rebuttal dated 6 April 2009. d. An AO, “enclosure (4), received from the HOMC Military Personnel Law Branch, regarding Petitioner’s request to remove the documents which references the NJP recommends relief. In this regard, and especially in light of the favorable AO, the Board substantially concurs with the comments contained in the AO and concludes that in the absence of the NUP document, the documentation referencing it, as it appears in the record,...